shudder to think


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 April
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October

My Links
the holy wild blog
comatose soul
Fairmoon's Blog
longshot
Shayno's Blog
The Holy Wild
Homestarrunner
Dog Judo!
Stupid Videos
Mat Kearney
Poor Old Lu

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



some random thoughts on knowing anything
12.21.04 (6:03 pm)   [edit]

Here is the current culmination of my thoughts prompted by all the comments you've given and the posts I've read.  How do we know that we know anything?  I mean, how do I know that these graphic symbols we call letters convey any meaning whatsoever?  Here's what I think: we know that we know through relationship.  To know anything or anyone requires a relationship.  When I first meet a chair (I often meet chairs about town), I don't know if it is something I can sit on or not.  I don't know what it is made out of (all kinds of stuff can look like all kinds of other stuff).  All I know is that it is shaped like something that will accept my buttocks and support my weight so I can rest my feet for a while.  So I meet the chair, I get closer to the chair, and I might even pick the chair up.  Ultimately, I trust the chair.  I sit and it supports me.  Over time, my relationship with the chair grows.  I know that it will support me.  I know that it is useful for more than just sitting.  I know what it is made of.  If my relationship with the chair is especially good, I care for it, and even heal it if it is broken.  I know it because I have a relationship with it.


All this to make one simple point.  Knowing...without relationship isn't really knowing.  We can make all the best logical arguments about the origins of the universe, the history of mankind, theology, philosophy, medicine, architecture, science, or whatever else might strike our fancy.  But if those arguments are based on logic without relationship, then they really don't mean anything.  They may be great arguments, but for life, they are wortheless.  The human mind is capable of a great many things, but I do not think it can know, truly know something outside of a relationship.

 
A little test
12.15.04 (1:16 pm)   [edit]
I was just wondering how well we get to know one another through this medium. So here’s a little test. I’m still pretty new with this, but check the rest of my blog. Check my comments and try to get a picture of who I am. I just want to see what you think. What size town do I live in? Have I traveled? What do I do? What do I enjoy doing in my free time? What do I like to eat? What type of music do I listen to? How much education have I had? Do I have pets? Where do I stand politically? Whatever you think about who I really am, please comment. It’s just a test. If you want, I’ll return the favor.
 
I'm right, you're wrong.
12.14.04 (11:36 am)   [edit]
Maybe I overreacted to Longshot's comment. But it brought up a good point. Whether we as followers of Christ put ourselves in that position or not, we are often regarded as having an "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude. And that certainly has been the case many times throughout history. But that is a perversion of Christ. It was never about an attitude of superiority. It's like this: Let's say a friend and I go hiking one weekend. And while we are on the trail he gets to be several yards ahead of me. After he turns a corner (a corner I have not yet come to), he sees a mountain lion standing in the trail in front of him. When he yells, "Lion!" I come running and at the same time the lion runs off into the brush. By the time I get there, there is no sign of the lion. Now if my friend is a little less experienced in the outdoors than me, I might question if he really saw a lion. I might not believe him. He might even be messing with me. But the truth remains. He saw something I didn't see. He is not taking an "I'm right, you're wrong posture." He's just telling the truth of what he experienced. This goes further. The lion is real, whether I believe it or not. Furthermore, I have a choice: to believe my friend's account and to be on my guard, or to disbelieve and not care. That's how it is with Christ. The truth is there. Some see it. Some don't. It's not about me being superior because I see it. It's not about those who don't being inferior because they do not. We're all on the trail together. And there is a lion about.
 
the gospel?
12.13.04 (12:40 pm)   [edit]
I’ve been an evangelical (please don’t politicize that too much) for most of my life. And being an evangelical, I believe in evangelism. I believe in sharing the evangelion (“Good News” for us English speaking types). But I wonder…what is the good news that people need to hear. Because, I think if it really was good news, wouldn’t more people want to hear it? Along with that thought, what is the message of good news that we as evangelicals are currently broadcasting. At least one version is that if you follow Christ you can ride around in a BMW with pompus men in funny suits driven by a lady with big, purple hair while other overly-made-up men and women sing songs that nobody really listens to (for real, I was watching this on TBN the other day…not that I watch it a lot, but the big hair caught my attention). To be honest, that isn’t good news to me. In fact, that is quite frightening. So what is the good news for those of us living in the struggles and melee of postmodern life?

I think it is this: You are not alone. You don’t have to do it all yourself. You can have everything without having everything. You can be more than you are now. Your talents matter. Your passions matter. Your dreams matter. Essentially, you matter. You mean something to someone. And that someone wants you to know that.

I think if we let go of all the religious jargon, all the meaningless tradition, all the pretense, all the politically motivated religious-right driven boycotts and movements, all of it and focus on the simple fact that we (that means everyone) mean something to someone and that someone wants us to know that, then maybe, just maybe, we can make a difference.

Now, you might be reading this and you might be an evangelical. And you might be saying, “That sounds like a bunch of postmodern, emerging church, toss-out-the-Bible-and-go -wild-theology.” For you, I offer 1 Timothy 2:3-4.

On the other hand, you may be a skeptic, an agnostic, an atheist. Maybe you’re just really leery of church and church people. Maybe this Jesus guy sounds too good to be true. Maybe you think its all made up. Maybe you think you’re too screwed up to be loved. For you, I offer this: Taste and see.
 
the big struggle
12.09.04 (3:50 pm)   [edit]

It seems to me that the biggest difficulty that Christians have with being Christian is not loving God, nor is it loving others.  It is loving God and loving others.  Somewhere in the most simple of Christ's commands, we've lost the simplicity.  Somewhere we've made what is the simple essence of God's plan a complicated mess of bad orthodoxy and even worse orthopraxy.  So why is this so difficult?  Well, at the risk of oversimplifying (wait, I never oversimplify)...at the risk of extrememe verbosity (?), we find it easy to love a perfect, holy, loving God and the more we do so, we discover the imperfections, darkness, and evil of people and that makes it difficult to love them.  Or, we find it easy to love the imperfect, messed-up people around us and in doing so we wonder how a perfect, holy, loving God could love them, or us for that matter.  So we get ourselves stuck in this little dichotomy.


But maybe...just maybe, it really is so simple.  Maybe it is in the perfect embracing the imperfect that God's plan is revealed the best.  Maybe it is because we misunderstand God's holiness, his otherness, his set-apart-ness.  Maybe we think that holiness implies perfection.  But the way I see it, holiness implies perfection in one area, love.  If we love perfectly, the we are holy as God is holy.  2 John 6 - This is love, that we walk in obedience to his commands.  And as you have heard from the beginning his command is that we walk in love.  Holiness equals love.  When we misrepresent holiness, we fall victim to many fallacies.  And, being holy and loving completely means that we must embrace things, ideas, and people that we may often times find unholy...but that's holiness...ya follow?


So maybe we need to redefine our terms.  And maybe, if we do, we will find our journey, whether in the ruts, waves, cubes, or wilds a bit more supernatural.

 
the grand adventure
12.01.04 (5:09 pm)   [edit]

I have this thing for adventures (check previous blog entry).  I try my best to get out and into the wilds of the world as often as I'm able.  And, I have this routine I go through in getting ready.  I lay out all the gear and tackle and trim I might need for the particular trip, the particular terrain, and the particular weather I might encounter.  I go through it all, check it three or four times to make sure I have everything so that I can get a good nights sleep.  Then, off to bed where I toss and turn in anticipation for most of the night.  It isn't necessarily the fact that I'll soon be further from civilization.  It is simply the adventure that awaits because no matter how well prepared you are, the adventure is always bigger than you're planning.


That's what God is profoundly (is that a word?) reminding me of right now.  I stand on the verge of the beginning of another chapter of this grand adventure that He has set before me.  I can't wait, and yet, I'm scared out of my mind.  I don't know what will happen next and that, I guess, is what I've come to love about it.  I'm excited because lately it has seemed that the adventure is far from me.  I've been in-the-little-cubicle-doi ng-my-nine-to-five-just-p rocessing-data rut that us Christian church-goers so often fall into.  But now, the adventure of the unknown calls again.


So, I get ready.  And toss and turn all night.